Preventive Medicine Reports

IntroductionAge-group specific disparities for dentalcare use persist in the United States. The COVID-19 led to delays in non-urgent dentalcare. We provide national estimates on dentalcare use and influencing factors for the U.S. population before and during the COVID-19. MethodsWe used nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for over pre-COVID-19 years (2018-2019) and COVID-19 years (2020-2021) We estimated yearly survey-weighted trends in mean non-zero dental visits by age followed Poisson regression, controlling for a comprehensive set of confounders across five domains of influence. Dentalcare visits were defined as visits to any dentalcare provider. ResultsOverall analytic sample included non-institutionalized community living persons (unweighted n=6518, weighted N[~]320 million) grouped as ages 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, 65-74 and 75+ present in all four years The prevalence ratio (PR) for dental visits was slightly higher for ages 75+ in comparison to ages 65-74 across years 2018-2021 and increased from 1.73 (95% CI: 1.4, 2.1) to 1.84 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.3) to 2.13 (95% CI: 1.7, 2.7) from 2018 to 2020 but rebounding to near pre-pandemic level in 2021 to 1.66 (95% CI, 1.3, 2.0). Consistent factors during COVID-19 pandemic years 2020-2021 that increased dental visits included dental insurance, high income, and having a usual source of care (p<0.01). ConclusionsDentalcare use rebounded for older adults in 2021 but remained below pre-pandemic levels. Practical ImplicationsIncreasing dentalcare visits across ages remains a key policy priority. Continued monitoring of dentalcare use trends beyond COVID-19 among older adults is critical to improve their oral health.

ObjectivesTo examine associations between cardiometabolic conditions and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to evaluate whether condition-associated HRQoL changed from 2001 to 2022. MethodsWe analyzed nationally representative data from U.S. adults aged [&ge;]18 years in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2001-2022. Survey years without BMI data (2017, 2019, 2021) were excluded. EQ-5D utilities were mapped from SF-12 scores using a validated algorithm. For each survey year, survey-weighted multivariable regression models estimated associations of sociodemographic characteristics, BMI, and cardiometabolic conditions (diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity, stroke) with HRQoL measured by EQ-5D. Temporal changes in condition-associated HRQoL decrements were assessed using meta-regression across years. Associations in recent survey years were summarized using pooled estimates from 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2022. ResultsOverall HRQoL improved from 2001 to 2022 across age groups, with the largest improvement among older adults. In pooled analyses, stroke was associated with the largest adjusted HRQoL decrement (-0.0714), followed by heart disease (-0.0503), diabetes (-0.0427), high blood pressure (-0.0328), obesity (-0.0305), and high cholesterol (-0.0236). Additional adjustment for BMI attenuated condition-associated decrements, most notably for obesity (-0.0305 to -0.0183), diabetes (-0.0427 to -0.0414), and high blood pressure (-0.0328 to -0.0316). Over time, diabetes- and heart disease-associated decrements attenuated linearly (diabetes: - 0.0489 in 2001 to -0.0406 in 2022; heart disease: -0.0591 to -0.0493). High blood pressure (-0.0337 in 2001, -0.0415 in 2012, -0.0306 in 2022) and obesity (-0.0305 in 2001, -0.0283 in 2012, -0.0367 in 2022) showed nonlinear patterns. ConclusionsCondition-associated HRQoL decrements varied over time, and recent-year utility estimates are recommended for population health research. HRQoL decrements for diabetes and heart disease attenuated, consistent with improvements in treatment and survival. High blood pressure-associated were lowest around 2012, and obesity-associated became more negative after 2012, consistent with worsening blood pressure control and obesity severity.

BackgroundDespite their potential to serve as a reduced-harm alternative to combustible tobacco, e-cigarette take-up remains low among older (45+) adult smokers, especially in the U.S. While social media is a known driver of vaping attitudes and behaviors in younger populations, its influence on older smokers is poorly understood. This paper provides the first focused analysis of e-cigarette-related social media exposure in this population, documenting its prevalence, characteristics, and attitudinal correlates. MethodsData come from an opt-in survey of U.S. adults (N = 974) recruited via Prolific, comprising three groups: (i) non-vaping smokers aged 45+ (N = 484), (ii) former-smoking vapers aged 45+ (N = 149), and (iii) any-vaping-status smokers aged 18-35 (N = 341). Descriptive statistics, weighted to U.S. population benchmarks, characterize self-reported exposure to e-cigarette-related content on social media. Logistic regressions estimate associations between exposure and intentions for future e-cigarette use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, and related attitudes. ResultsOlder smokers (35.3%) reported exposure to e-cigarette-related content on social media less frequently than both older vapers (44.0%) and younger smokers (72.0%). For older smokers, e-cigarette health risks were the most frequently reported topic of content viewed, followed by youth vaping and e-cigarette addiction. Among this group, exposure was positively associated with stated intentions for future e-cigarette use. Exposure was not significantly associated with perceived e-cigarette harms for any group. ConclusionsFindings provide suggestive evidence that social media exposure may promote e-cigarette adoption among older smokers. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the observed associations may reflect selection bias or reverse causality. If a causal relationship exists, the patterns observed suggest that exposure influences e-cigarette adoption through mechanisms other than updating beliefs about e-cigarette risks. While these results tentatively support the potential of social media as a channel for older-smoker harm reduction, any policy applications must carefully weigh privacy concerns and risks to youth. Rigorous experimental studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify how social media might be leveraged to improve public health outcomes among older smokers.

Background: People with HIV (PWH) have increased risk for cardiovascular diseases and other age-related comorbidities. These risks can be reduced through moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), but MVPA can be difficult to sustain over time. Purpose: We tested tailored text messages added to motivational interviewing (MI) to sustain MVPA among PWH. Messages were created based on Two Minds Theory and matched to daily survey responses about exercise barriers. Methods: 118 PWH ages > 50 were initially randomized to high-intensity interval training or continuous moderate-intensity exercise. After 16 weeks, 92 participants were re-randomized to receive either tailored messages plus MI, or educational control messages, for 12 weeks. Both groups completed daily barrier surveys and wore an ActiGraph monitor for 1 week/month. Results: PWH still receiving messages at 28 weeks maintained their MVPA, ending at M = 48.8 minutes per day (SD = 45.8, n = 22/29), compared to a decrease among PWH in the educational-control group, ending at M = 40.7 (SD = 24.6, n = 25/32), p = .01 for the group-by-time interaction. Findings were similar using both actigraphy and self-reported MVPA, and were robust to attrition based on intent-to-treat analysis. PWH in the tailored-messaging group also reported higher exercise self-efficacy and better perceived health over time, relative to those in the educational-control group. Conclusions: An automated tailored-messaging intervention led to sustained MVPA. Tailored messages were superior to non-tailored educational messages, and may help PWH maintain their long-term health. Exploratory analyses suggested these effects were additive to motivational interviewing.

Introduction: Monitoring trends in transitions in the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and cigarettes among youth is important for understanding the potential public health impacts of these products. Methods: Using a weighted Markov multistate transition model accounting for complex survey design, we estimated transition rates and one-year transition probabilities between never, non-current, ENDS-only, and cigarette use (with or without dual use of ENDS) among 26,744 youth aged 12-17 years who participated in at least two consecutive waves from Waves 2-7.5 (approximately 2015-2023) of the nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. We also estimated transitions stratified by ages 12-14 and 15-17 years. Results. The one-year probability of ENDS-only initiation from never use among youth peaked in 2017-19 (Waves 4-5) at 4.0% (95%CI: 3.6-4.3%) and was higher for 15-17-year-olds at 5.8% (95%CI: 5.2-6.4%) than 12-14-year-olds at 2.2% (95%CI: 1.8-2.6%). In the following years, ENDS-only initiation rates declined and plateaued, with 2.6% (95%CI: 2.3-3.0%) initiation in 2022-23. Cigarette initiation from never use decreased over 2015-23 from 0.8% (95%CI: 0.6-1.0%) in 2015-16 to 0.1% (95%CI: 0.0-0.2%) in 2022-23. There was an increase in the fraction of youth who transitioned from non-current product use to ENDS-only use from 13.7% (95%CI: 7.5-20.0%) in 2015-16 to 35.1% (95%CI: 25.4-44.8%) in 2022-23, paired with a decrease in non-current use to cigarette use from 20.9% (95%CI: 11.8-30.0%) to 6.3% (95%CI: 1.7-10.8%). Transitions from ENDS-only or cigarette use to non-current use remained relatively constant over time at around 25% and 15% per year, respectively. Conclusion. ENDS-only use initiation has changed over time, peaking around 2019 and subsequently decreasing and plateauing, but cessation rates for both ENDS and cigarettes have remained relatively stable. Thus, interruption of tobacco product initiation may be the most effective approach to reducing tobacco product use among youth.

Background Ever since the COVID-19 vaccine became available, vaccinations in adolescents lagged behind adults. Whether adolescent vaccination rates were higher in states with "Minor Consent" policies remains unknown. Methods We accessed adolescent (aged 12-17) county-level vaccine administration data from the CDC (12/2020-05/2023). Our outcomes were COVID-19 vaccination counts for: 1) initial dose, 2) completed series doses, and 3) booster doses. Panel Poisson regression models with state and time random effects, seasonal fixed effects, log-population offsets, and adult vaccination rates were estimated to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR), testing the association between residing in a state with a Minor Consent policy and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Results Overall, for the initial dose and complete series, there was no difference in adolescent COVID-19 vaccination between states with or without Minor Consent policies. However, we found that Minor Consent policies were associated with lower COVID-19 booster doses (IRR = 0.582; 95% CI: 0.409, 0.828; p = 0.0026). This association was not found in urban counties (IRR = 0.867; CI = 0.722, 1.043; p = 0.1295), but only in rural counties (IRR = 0.541; CI = 0.401, 0.730; p < 0.0001). Conclusions Minor Consent policies were not associated with higher adolescent COVID-19 vaccination. Rather, we found that Minor Consent policies were associated with lower adolescent vaccination for booster doses in rural counties. Despite minimal evidence of impact, states continue to implement Minor Consent vaccination policies. Future research should investigate not just other vaccines, but also how Minor Consent policies impact parental trust in public health more broadly.

IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, incarcerated populations faced heightened risk of exposure due to healthcare barriers, restrictive environments, and pre-existing health conditions. Consequently, Correctional Officers (COs) faced increased risk of COVID-19 exposure. Given the health benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and the rise in vaccine hesitancy, this study examined the relationship between COs health beliefs and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. MethodsA health beliefs survey was administered to Massachusetts-based COs (n=118). Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection modeling and logistic regression was utilized to analyze the survey data. ResultsCOs with higher trust in vaccines and a prior positive COVID-19 test were most likely to get vaccinated voluntarily. Those with low trust in vaccines and no previous positive COVID-19 test were least likely to receive the vaccine. ConclusionDespite the severe impact of COVID-19 in correctional settings, and the evidence of vaccine efficacy against hospitalization and death, vaccine uptake among COs remains low.

Objectives. To test whether the association between household income and tooth retention differs by race/ethnicity and whether this interaction varies by reason for the most recent dental visit among US adults. Methods. We analyzed 13,190 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009 to 2018). Survey weighted linear regression estimated interactions between household income and race/ethnicity in models of tooth retention, stratified by reason for last dental visit. Results. Higher income was associated with greater tooth retention across groups, but income related gains were larger for Non-Hispanic White adults than for Non Hispanic Black and Mexican American adults, particularly in problem-focused care settings. In problem focused visits, each higher income category was associated with 0.5 additional teeth among White adults (95% CI 0.4, 0.6) versus 0.2 (95% CI 0.0, 0.4) among Black adults and 0.1 (95% CI 0.1, 0.3) among Mexican American adults. Racial differences were attenuated in routine check-up contexts. Conclusions. Income related gains in tooth retention differed by race/ethnicity and dental care context. Public Health Implications. Expanding access alone may be insufficient to reduce racial inequities in oral health.

BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy remains a public health issue despite the fact that vaccines are readily available and recommended for all persons aged [&ge;]5 years in the United States. We aimed to describe parents plan to vaccinate their children in two different populations: families in a prospective, longitudinal cohort study and families experiencing homelessness enrolled in cross-sectional surveillance for acute respiratory infections. MethodsParticipants were parents/guardians of children aged <18 years, recruited either from a serial cross-sectional homeless study in Seattle-King County, Washington or from a household cohort study in the Seattle Metropolitan area. Participants were surveyed during October 2020--May 2021 about their plans to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Vaccine plans were described by study population as well as by sociodemographic features and over time. ResultsAmong parents of 640 children enrolled in the household study surveyed in October 2021, 66% reported planning to vaccinate their child vaccinated against COVID-19 once vaccines became available. This proportion increased slightly over the study period, to 75% in May 2021. In the homeless study, 1284 surveys were collected from parents of 338 children. The proportion of parents of families experiencing homelessness who planned to have their child vaccinated against COVID-19 ranged from 52% in November 2020 to 16% in March 2021. ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccine plan among parents of children experiencing homelessness in Seattle-King County decreased over time, with the majority of parents reporting that they did not plan or were undecided about COVID-19 vaccination for their children by May 2021. Further investigations are needed among families experiencing homelessness to assess vaccine attitudes and perceived barriers to getting their children vaccinated against COVID-19. SummaryPlans to get vaccinated against COVID-19 was less common in children experiencing homelessness and intent decreased over time during the study, whereas vaccination was acceptable in other families in Seattle, WA

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the return on investment (ROI) of a community based Diabetes Self Management Program (DSMP) enhanced with health related social needs (HRSN) screening and referrals, implemented by the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene with three community based organizations in highly impacted, under resourced neighborhoods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cost benefit analysis from a public sector payer perspective was conducted among 171 adults with type 2 diabetes who completed a six week, peer led DSMP delivered by community health workers (CHWs) in English, Spanish, and Korean during 2018 2019. A time driven, activity based costing model captured direct implementation costs, CHW workforce turnover, and administrative overhead. Monetized benefits included avoided diabetes related complications, reductions in self reported emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, and quality adjusted life year (QALY) gains from improved medication adherence. Univariate sensitivity analyses tested robustness under conservative assumptions. RESULTS: Total program costs were $179,224; monetized benefits totaled $1,824,213, yielding a net benefit of $1,644,989 and an ROI of 918%, approximately $10 returned per $1 invested. Excluding QALY gains, ROI remained 551%. Self reported ED visits declined from 149 to 82 and hospitalizations from 93 to 24 in the six months following intervention. Over 80% of participants reported housing instability; 72% were Medicaid covered and 16% uninsured. Sensitivity analyses confirmed a positive ROI under all conservative scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: A CHW led, community based DSMP integrated with HRSN screening and referrals delivered substantial economic and public health value among adults facing housing instability and structural barriers to care. Findings support inclusion of DSMP as a covered benefit in Medicaid managed care, value based payment arrangements, and housing access initiatives to advance equitable diabetes outcomes.

BackgroundTobacco use among young people remains a major public health concern in Indonesia, where smoking prevalence is high and metabolic risk factors such as overweight and hypertension are increasing. Evidence linking smoking behavior, particularly e-cigarette use, to early cardiometabolic risk in low- and middle-income countries is still limited. This study examined overweight and hypertension profiles among young smokers using nationally representative data from Indonesia. MethodsThis secondary analysis used data from the Indonesian Health Survey 2023. Participants were young adults aged 18-25 years with complete information on smoking status, anthropometry, and blood pressure (n = 12,770). Smoking status was categorized as conventional smokers, e-smokers, and dual smokers. Outcomes included overweight/obesity (BMI [&ge;]23 kg/m2), central obesity (waist circumference [&ge;]90 cm for men and [&ge;]80 cm for women), and hypertension ([&ge;]130/80 mmHg). Logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) controlling for age, gender, smoking duration, residence, and socioeconomic proxy variables. ResultsMost respondents were conventional smokers (94%), followed by dual smokers (4%) and e-smokers (2%). E-smokers showed higher mean BMI and the greatest prevalence of overweight/obesity (40%) and central obesity (18%). After adjustment, e-smokers and dual smokers had higher odds of overweight/obesity (AOR = 1.37 and 1.41, respectively) and central obesity (AOR = 1.47 and 1.53, respectively) compared with conventional smokers. Hypertension prevalence (11-13%) did not differ significantly across smoking categories. ConclusionAmong young Indonesian smokers, e-cigarette and dual use were associated with higher odds of overweight and central obesity but not hypertension. These findings highlight the importance of integrating tobacco control with early metabolic risk prevention strategies targeting youth.

Background The clinical safety profile of e-cigarette use for smoking reduction remains poorly characterized. This study compared the relative safety and tolerability of nicotine e-cigarette use with non-nicotine e-cigarettes or a non-aerosol cigarette substitute (CS) among adults interested in reducing their smoking. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in a 6-month, double-blind RCT involving 520 participants assigned to either e-cigarettes with 0, 8, or 36 mg/mL nicotine or a CS. AEs were coded using CTCAE V4.0 and assessed for frequency, severity, seriousness and relatedness across groups. Cumulative incidence was calculated over 24 weeks. We estimated risk differences (RDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for frequently reported AEs (>=1% of participants overall) comparing e-cigarette vs. CS and nicotine versus non-nicotine e-cigarette groups. Fisher's exact test, with adjustment for multiple comparisons, was used to assess statistical significance. Results Most study-related AEs (those rated as possibly, probably, or definitely related by medical monitor) were mild in severity and none were classified as serious. At 24 weeks, cumulative incidence of first study-related AE was highest in the 36 mg/mL (37.0%) and 8 mg/mL (35.2%) e-cigarette groups, followed by 0 mg/mL (23.4%), and lowest in CS group (2.5%). E-cigarette users experienced significantly greater risks of cough (RD [95%CI]: 8.5% [5.6-11.3]), headache (RD [95%CI]: 5.4% [3.3-7.6]) and sore throat (RD [95%CI]: 5.4% [3.2-7.6]) as compared with the CS group. Cough was also more common in those randomized to nicotine versus non-nicotine e-cigarettes (RD [95%CI]: 8.1% [3.4-12.8]). Conclusion All study products were generally well-tolerated; however, AEs were more common in e-cigarette groups, especially with nicotine. Findings highlight the need to monitor common symptoms such as cough, headache, and sore throat in clinical and regulatory evaluations of e-cigarette safety.

BackgroundOral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have become the second most commonly used nicotine product among U.S. youth. However, little is known about how ONP use is distributed across population subgroups and how strongly it is patterned by use of other tobacco or nicotine products. MethodData were drawn from the 2021-2023 waves of the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. middle and high school students (N = 66,349). We estimated the annual survey-weighted prevalence of current ONP use ([&ge;]1 day in the past 30). Using 2023 data (N = 20,174), we estimated prevalence by demographics and other tobacco/nicotine product use, and fitted survey-weighted Poisson regression models to estimate associations of current ONP use with demographics and other nicotine/tobacco product use. ResultsIn 2023, 1.6% reported current ONP use (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.1), up from 0.8% in 2021 (95% CI 0.5-1.0). Prevalence in 2023 was higher among males (2.3%, 95% CI 1.5-3.1) than females (0.8%, 95% CI 0.4-1.3), and among students who used any other tobacco or nicotine product (13.4%, 95% CI 10.3-16.5) than those who did not (0.4%, 95% CI 0.1-0.8). In fully adjusted models, use of nicotine products other than cigarettes or e-cigarettes showed the strongest association with ONP use (APR 21.1, 95% CI 13.0-34.0), followed by cigarette smoking (APR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.7) and e-cigarette use (APR 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.5). Most current ONP users also used other tobacco/nicotine products (75.0%), though 16.6% reported no lifetime use of other products. ConclusionsOverall ONP prevalence among U.S. youth remains low but is increasing. While ONP use is largely concentrated in youth who use other nicotine/tobacco products, it is also increasing among adolescents who are otherwise nicotine-naive. These findings highlight the need for continued monitoring and targeted regulations that balance harm reduction for people who smoke against the risk of expanding nicotine dependence among youth. Key Points QuestionWhat are the prevalence, demographic patterns, and tobacco/nicotine co-use profiles of oral nicotine pouch users among US middle and high school students? FindingsIn this cross-sectional study of 66,349 students from the 2021-2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey, current oral nicotine pouch use doubled from 0.8% in 2021 to 1.6% in 2023. Most users also used other tobacco or nicotine products, but the proportion of current users with no lifetime use of other products increased from 7.4% to 16.6%. MeaningAlthough oral nicotine pouch use among US youth remains low, increasing uptake among adolescents without prior tobacco or nicotine exposure suggests a need for targeted prevention efforts alongside continued surveillance.

Synthetic food dyes (SFDs) have been associated with neurobehavioral symptoms in children, including hyperactivity, inattention, anxiety, and irritability. Although often associated with candy and snack foods, SFDs are also present in hydration beverages commonly consumed by children during illness and physical exertion. This study examined the prevalence of SFDs in hydration drinks by target age group and product type. Ingredient information was collected for 102 hydration beverages from a single retail in Carson City, Nevada in 2024. Products were categorized as pediatric-marketed, adult-marketed, or marketed to all ages. Of 24 pediatric-marketed drinks, 21 (87.5%) contained at least one synthetic dye, most commonly Red 40 (66.7%), Blue 1 (61.9%), and Yellow 6 (19.0%). Among six adult-marketed drinks, two (33.5%) contained dyes, primarily Blue 1 and Red 40. Of 72 all-age products, 20 (27.7%) contained synthetic dyes. Overall, 43 of 102 drinks (42.2%) contained at least one SFD, with Blue 1 (51.2%), Red 40 (44.2%), and Yellow 6 (23.3%) being most prevalent. Hydration beverages are often perceived as health-supportive and are frequently consumed during physiological stress. Given prior evidence linking SFDs to behavioral effects, the high prevalence of dyes in pediatric hydration products warrants clinical awareness.

Abstract Importance: The overall prevalence of youth nicotine and tobacco product use has declined over recent years, but the product landscape continues to evolve rapidly, particularly with new disposable e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches. Objective: To examine changes between 2024 and 2025 in the prevalence of nicotine and tobacco product use among US middle and high school students and describe shifts in product characteristics among current e-cigarette and nicotine pouch users. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the 2024 and 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), a school-based survey of US students in grades 6-12 (approximately ages 11-18). The analytic sample included 29,678 students in 2024 and 23,557 students in 2025. Exposures: Survey year (2025 vs 2024). Main Outcomes and Measures: Past 30-day use of nicotine/tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches, cigarettes, and other combustible and non-combustible products. Among current e-cigarette and nicotine pouch users, frequency of use, device type, brands, and flavors were assessed. Results: In 2025, 7.2% (95% CI, 6.4-8.2%) of US middle and high school students reported past 30-day use of any nicotine/tobacco product, compared with 8.1% (7.4-8.9%) in 2024. E-cigarettes remained the most commonly used product (5.2%, 4.5-5.9%); 1.7% (1.4-2.1%) used nicotine pouches, 1.7% (1.4-1.9%) smoked cigarettes, and 2.7% (2.4-3.1%) smoked any combustible tobacco product. Among current e-cigarette users, 40.7% (36.7-44.9%) reported frequent use and 27.0% (24.0-30.2%) reported daily use in 2025. Disposable e-cigarette use increased from 55.8% (52.6-59.0%) in 2024 to 66.7% (62.5-70.7%) in 2025, while pod/cartridge device use declined. Flavored product use was reported by 90.0% of e-cigarette users and 88.0% of nicotine pouch users. The most commonly reported brands were Geek Bar among e-cigarette users (61.1%) and ZYN among nicotine pouch users (69.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: Overall youth nicotine and tobacco use remains relatively low, but the product landscape is evolving rapidly, with increasing disposable device use and shifting brand preferences. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing, product-specific surveillance to inform public health strategies and regulatory policies.

Background: Lung cancer screening can reduce lung cancer mortality through early detection, but uptake of the NHS Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) programme remains low. Behaviourally informed invitation messages have been proposed as a low-cost approach to increase attendance, but evidence of their effectiveness in lung cancer screening is mixed. Few intervention studies used evidence-based behaviour change frameworks, and rarely tailored invitation strategies to empirically identified barriers and enablers. Methods: In an online experiment, 3,274 adults aged 55-74 years and with a history of smoking were randomised to see one of four behaviourally informed invitation messages or a control message. Participants then rated their intention to attend a TLHC appointment, and selected barriers and enablers to attending from a pre-defined list, which were classified according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Invitation messages were mapped to Behaviour Change Techniques using the Theory and Techniques Tool. Message conditions were compared on intention to attend TLHC using bootstrapped ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons. Exploratory counterfactual mediation analyses examined the role of fear in intention to attend. Results: Behaviourally informed invitation messages did not meaningfully increase intention to attend TLHC compared with the control message. While a GP-endorsed message showed a small potential benefit relative to the other conditions, this finding was not robust after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Participants most frequently reported barriers related to Emotion (particularly fear), Social Influence, and Knowledge, while Beliefs about Consequences emerged as the primary enabler of attendance. Only around half of reported barriers and enablers were addressed by the invitation messages. Exploratory analyses found that fear was associated with lower intention to attend a TLHC appointment, yet none of the behaviourally informed messages appeared to reduce fear compared to the control message. Conclusions: Improving lung cancer screening uptake will likely require invitation messages that directly address emotional concerns, particularly fear, alongside credible recommendations. These findings highlight the importance of systematically aligning invitation message content with empirically identified behavioural influences when designing scalable interventions to improve lung cancer screening uptake.

Introduction: Economic opportunity is a core pillar of the American Dream but is not distributed equally across communities. Substantial evidence has identified economic opportunity as an independent social determinant of health, but relatively little is known about opportunity's relationship with other socioeconomic characteristics such as income. Here we address this gap in the literature to examine how area-level economic opportunity modifies the income-health gradient. Methods: We used multivariable ordinary least squares models to estimate the association between self-reported health and economic opportunity across household income levels for working age adults (ages 25-64). Our measures of income and health come from the 2010-2019 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplements. Our measure of economic opportunity was drawn from Opportunity Insights and represents the county-averaged national income percentile rank attained in adulthood for individuals born to parents at the 25th percentile of the income distribution. We adjusted for a wide range of individual- and county-level demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Results: We find that county-level economic opportunity modified the gradient in self-reported health and household income among working-age adults. Effects were particularly pronounced in the lowest income deciles -- an interdecile increase in economic opportunity was associated with closing almost 33% of the gap in health between the lowest and highest income deciles. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: We show that local area economic opportunity flattens the relationship between household income and health, with lower-income individuals benefitting the most from living in high opportunity areas.

IntroductionMortality and smoking rates vary over time across the US. The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network--Lung Working Group (CISNET-LWG) has developed a smoking history generator to describe the effects smoking on health. This work further refines these parameters and quantifies effects on life expectancy MethodsData from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) were used to estimate smoking history parameters for each state. The age-period-cohort was used in most cases, but an age-cohort mode was used for cessation probabilities. Population mortality data were used to estimate mortality rates for all causes, lung cancer, and non-lung cancer. These were partitioned by smoking status. ResultsCalifornia and Kentucky are states with more or less aggressive tobacco control. The difference between population cohort life expectancy and life expectancy of never smoker was greater for males than for females, and it was greater in Kentucky than California because of higher smoking rates. These differences decreased with time. Similar result are shown for each state. ConclusionsVariation in smoking parameters and mortality trends vary considerably among states. These show variation in exposure to tobacco smoking and their effects on life expectancy. The Southeast region tends to have greater differences from never smokers because of higher smoking rates. However, there are also other factors affecting mortality rates.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for qualitative analysis in substance use research, yet their performance relative to human coders remains underexplored. This study compares ChatGPT-4.0 with human coders in identifying and describing the core innovation of NIH grants focused on reducing opioid overdose. A total of 118 NIH HEAL Initiative grant abstracts were independently coded by ChatGPT and humans to generate innovation descriptions, which were then evaluated by both human raters and ChatGPT for depth/detail and relevance/completeness using 5-point Likert scales. Identical instructions were used across all coding and evaluation stages. ChatGPT-generated descriptions were consistently rated higher than human-generated descriptions on both dimensions. Human evaluators rated ChatGPT outputs at an average of 4.47 for both depth/detail and relevance/completeness, compared to 3.33 and 3.24 for human outputs, respectively (F(1,176)=133.9, p<0.001). These findings suggest that LLMs, when carefully prompted, can enhance the efficiency and quality of qualitative research evaluation.

Introduction: Understanding the factors influencing perceptions of cancer-related information is crucial for improving public health communication. This study explores the association between perceived difficulty in understanding information related to cancer (Cancer info Hard to Understand) and concerns about the quality of cancer-related information (Concern about Cancer Info Quality) with the extent of difficulty in comprehending medical statistics information (Understanding Medical Statistics). Methods: Data came from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). The cross-sectional study included 1972 participants with a response rate of 67.36% for Cancer info Hard to Understand, and 65.31% for Concern about Cancer Info Quality. We investigated the effect of Understanding Medical Statistics on Cancer info Hard to Understand, and Concern about Cancer Info Quality using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models with survey weights. The multivariable logistic regression model was adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education level, employment history, confidence in internet health resources, and social media. The chi-square test was used to measure the association between the predictors and the outcome. Results: Individuals finding medical statistics hard to understand were more likely to be concerned regarding the quality of the cancer-related information (AOR=1.74, 95% CI: [1.20, 2.52]) and also found cancer-related information difficult to comprehend (AOR=1.89, 95% CI: [1.19, 3.00]). Also, the influence of social media on health information seeking was significantly associated with Concern about Cancer Info Quality (AOR=2.24; 95% CI: [1.33, 3.76]), and Cancer info Hard to Understand (AOR=2.84; 95% CI: [1.61, 5.03]). Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of understanding medical statistics in shaping perceptions of cancer-related information. From an epidemiological perspective, enhancing statistical literacy is essential for making informed health decisions, addressing health disparities, and designing effective, targeted cancer communication strategies.